<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=17&amp;t=6612" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2011-06-27T14:51:15+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=17&amp;t=6612</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[akay]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-06-27T14:51:15+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-06-27T14:51:15+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31586#p31586</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31586#p31586"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31586#p31586"><![CDATA[
Hi<br /><br /><br />So actually I switched to the xenomai framework with an adeos patch. I getted far more better results (latency between 20 and 50 us for interruption handling)<br /><br />I only used the instruction from xenomai.<br /><br />If you want I have some debian/ubuntu package I could share for the setup. <br /><br />If you prefer to compile on your own the configuration, I give you here the config file I used from a vanilla linux-2.6.34.5 kernel with the latest xenomai patch, and just followed the xenomai instructions. This working fine for the RB 110 board. I don't know for other board.<br /><a href="http://biorob2.epfl.ch/users/tuleu/data/config-2.6.34.5-ipipe-vortex" class="postlink">http://biorob2.epfl.ch/users/tuleu/data/config-2.6.34.5-ipipe-vortex</a><br /><br />best regards<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2733">akay</a> — Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:51 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[ashishmach]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-06-10T12:29:31+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-06-10T12:29:31+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31495#p31495</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31495#p31495"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31495#p31495"><![CDATA[
@akay<br />Hello,<br /><br />Your cyclictest window shows that no High resolution timers,,,,,so you didn't need it ?<br /><br />And also any good luck with the board is everything working good???? <br />I am actually planning to put the RT patch in my Roboard-100 so your reply would be a great help.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2776">ashishmach</a> — Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:29 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[akay]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-31T12:32:13+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-05-31T12:32:13+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31396#p31396</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31396#p31396"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31396#p31396"><![CDATA[
Hi<br /><br /><br />so after some trials, I succeeded to install a rt-preempt kernel using the linux rt patch.<br /><br />It supports lot of features of the roboard, like the VGA card, the Ethernet, and the roboard wifi card, out of the box ! For this I had to use the exact 2.6.33 kernel, since :<br /><br /><ul><li>it have support of the RDC IDE controller driver (CONFIG_PATA_RDC=y)</li><li>it does have the support of VIA VT6655 chip for wireless in a staging driver (CONFIG_VT6655=m)</li><li>I also have to modify the ext4 support in the kernel from module to build in (m -&gt; y). Why did Roboard guys put this file system in a module rather than built-in support, since it is almost the default on lucid lynx to use ext4 filesystem (at least they did not put in their tutorial any advice to use ext3 rather than ext4)</li></ul><br />So in short :<br /><ul><li>I just used the linux kernel 2.6.33.7 : <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.gz">ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v ... 3.7.tar.gz</a><!-- m --></li><li>with the linux rt30 patch : <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/older/patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.gz">ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/p ... .2-rt30.gz</a><!-- m --></li><li>and used this configuration file : <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://biorob2.epfl.ch/users/tuleu/data/config-2.6.33.7.2-rt30-vortex">http://biorob2.epfl.ch/users/tuleu/data ... t30-vortex</a><!-- m --></li></ul>and was able to boot on the kernel with an ubuntu 10.04.  This version is mandatory for me since it is for a 4 year project, and we need Long term support for this. 9.10 is clearly not an option.<br /><br />For now I am getting poor latency result and I am checking how to change the configuration to have better result. Indeed the results are strange. I did not have any repeatability. The same test could give jitter latency of about 1ms (really bad) down to 246 us ! I used the cyclictest tool coming from rt patch users, and here are the output of some different test under the same condition (no load at all) :<br /><br /><dl class="codebox"><dt>Code: </dt><dd><code>user@host $ sudo ./cyclictest -p 89 -n <br />WARNING: High resolution timers not available<br />policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/139 6188              <br /><br />T: 0 ( 5857) P:89 I:1000 C:80394045 Min:    238 Act:  244 Avg:  246 Max:     411<br /><br />user@host $ sudo ./cyclictest -p 89 -n <br />WARNING: High resolution timers not available<br />policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.06 0.02 0.00 1/141 6230          <br /><br />T: 0 ( 6230) P:89 I:1000 C:   7875 Min:    879 Act:  886 Avg:  887 Max:     929<br /><br />user@host $ sudo ./cyclictest -p 89 -n <br />WARNING: High resolution timers not available<br />policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/139 6256          <br /><br />T: 0 ( 6251) P:89 I:1000 C:3603080 Min:    278 Act:  284 Avg:  286 Max:     473<br /></code></dd></dl><br /><br />So if anyone has better experience with linux realtime system or this particular patch, or have any idea that could explain this behavior, he is welcome !<br /><br />Finally, once my setup will be completely ready and functionnal, I may also provide some debian packages for lucid.<ul></ul><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2733">akay</a> — Tue May 31, 2011 12:32 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[gdo]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-17T19:39:58+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-05-17T19:39:58+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31282#p31282</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31282#p31282"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31282#p31282"><![CDATA[
Ok, I will check my tutorial carefully to be sure nothing is missing.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2502">gdo</a> — Tue May 17, 2011 7:39 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[akay]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-17T17:38:31+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-05-17T17:38:31+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31281#p31281</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31281#p31281"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31281#p31281"><![CDATA[
Actually we are using an RB 110 board. Since it is the same chip, I did not thought that it made a big difference.<br /><br />I tried your tutorial with different version, and also with the exact same kernel version that you shown in your tutorial.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2733">akay</a> — Tue May 17, 2011 5:38 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[gdo]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-17T15:13:06+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-05-17T15:13:06+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31275#p31275</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31275#p31275"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31275#p31275"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>akay wrote:</cite><br />&lt;li&gt;I tried to reproduce exactly the tutorial proposed by gdo here : <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/doku.php?id=robotics:computing:xenomai_install_on_roboard">http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/do ... on_roboard</a><!-- m --><br />It boots fine on virtualbox, however, when booting on the roboard, I got stuck while loading the kernel. &lt;/li&gt;<br />&lt;/ul&gt;<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Hello,<br /><br />Do you use a RB-110 or RB-100 ?<br />Someone contacted me about 2 months ago, he had problems with RB-110. He still have some but he can boot on the real time kernel <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" />. I'm helping him to solve this.<br /><br />If you are using the RB-100, did you use exactly same version as mine ? You said you use 10.04 as I used 9.10.<br /><br />An other thing important, the Vortex86DX is no more supported by new ubuntu version since 10.10. Even if it is writed for i386. See here for more details : <br /><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickMeerkat/ReleaseNotes" class="postlink">10.10 Maverick Release notes</a><br />See in the Linux kernel 2.6.35 section.<br /><br />gdo<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2502">gdo</a> — Tue May 17, 2011 3:13 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[akay]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-17T13:51:34+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-05-17T13:51:34+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31274#p31274</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31274#p31274"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=31274#p31274"><![CDATA[
Hi everyone<br /><br /><br />I am also interested in using real time capacity with the roboard for an high end robotics research project.<br /><br />I succesfully installed an ubuntu 10.04 server version, and installed the linux-2.6.34.1-vortex-sg patch available from roboard website.<br /><br />After this I tried many time to compile and patch a linux kernel for Rt capability. None of my trials worked out until now :<br /><br /><ul><li>I tried to use both RTAI and adeos patch on the patched 2.6.34.1-vortex-sg sources (just 4 lines of difference with 'vanilla' linux-2.6.34.1 ). The system doesn't boot</li><li>I tried to just use the debian package 'linux-rt', It boots without any problem on a virtualbox that use the SD card as hard drive. However, it fails on the roboard : It seems to be unable to found the SD card as an hard drive</li><li>I tried to reproduce exactly the tutorial proposed by gdo here : <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/doku.php?id=robotics:computing:xenomai_install_on_roboard">http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/do ... on_roboard</a><!-- m --><br />It boots fine on virtualbox, however, when booting on the roboard, I got stuck while loading the kernel. </li></ul><br /><br />Does anyone succesfully installed any RT linux patch on the roboard ?<br /><br />I would appreciate any help !<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2733">akay</a> — Tue May 17, 2011 1:51 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[gdo]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-05-17T15:19:51+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-04-07T11:07:09+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30802#p30802</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30802#p30802"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30802#p30802"><![CDATA[
Hello Andy,<br /><br />If you talk about Xenomai patch and admit you will use Xenomai Native API, I think the <a href="http://www.xenomai.org/documentation/branches/v2.3.x/pdf/Native-API-Tour-rev-C.pdf" class="postlink">Native API tour document</a> would answer your question. Page 7 you can read :<br /><br /><blockquote class="uncited"><div><br />When a real­time task in primary mode issues a regular Linux system call, it is<br />immediately and transparently migrated by Xenomai to the Linux domain, since<br />the operation could not be fulfilled into the Xenomai domain directly. At that<br />point, the real­time task re­enters the Linux kernel at the closest rescheduling<br />point, and resumes the standard Linux system call procedure. Time­wise, the cost<br />of such migration obviously depends on the granularity of the Linux kernel.<br />Specifically, the longest path between two executions of the rescheduling<br />procedure inside the Linux kernel defines the worst case.<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />I'm not a Xenomai expert, but I think you will have to study what you need (latency, periods, ...) and check if the roboard worst cases suit your needs. It will determine if you need to rewrite drivers or modify your actual source code. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><br /><br />Gilles<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2502">gdo</a> — Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:07 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Andy2011]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-04-07T10:17:51+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-04-07T10:17:51+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30800#p30800</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30800#p30800"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Real time and drivers]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=30800#p30800"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />First of all sorry if i make any mistake putting this message hear(it is my first time posting in a forum).<br /><br />I am trying to use my roboard with his I2C port to control some brushless motors and A/D and USB ports to get information of sensors . I have an ubuntu running and all my code is in c++. I want to know if i patch my linux to have real time properties, i could still use the functions to write/ read from all the ports from the roboard? Do i need to develope new drivers?<br /><br />Goodbye<br /><br />And thanks in advance for your answers<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2680">Andy2011</a> — Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:17 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[gdo]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-12-17T18:04:35+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-12-17T18:04:35+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=29386#p29386</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=29386#p29386"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=29386#p29386"><![CDATA[
Hello,<br /><br />I am the author of the geonobot-wiki article you have found.<br /><br />After applying the kernel patch for Xenomai, you can apply a specific roboard patch if you need. You just have to consider that it could generate some conflicts/bug with the xenomai patch. So just test it because I didn't. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><br /><br />If you have Ubuntu, you have an easier solution to get a real-time kernel, maybe you can test it. Just install the following package :<br /><a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/fr/source/lucid-updates/linux-rt" class="postlink">http://packages.ubuntu.com/fr/source/lucid-updates/linux-rt</a><br /><br />with the command :<br /><br /><dl class="codebox"><dt>Code: </dt><dd><code>sudo aptitude install linux-rt</code></dd></dl><br /><br />I have not tested it yet. But I will very soon. But for this one, consider you will not be able to apply a kernel patch as the kernel is already build. If you want to patch and rebuild your kernel, you will have to do it following this link :<br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RT_PREEMPT_HOWTO">https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RT_PREEMPT_HOWTO</a><!-- m --><br /><br />I do not exactly remember what more the roboard patch gives, I'm not sure it is really needed in new kernels. I have to verify. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><br /><br />Good luck !<br />Gilles<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2502">gdo</a> — Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:04 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[d3xt3r13]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-10-12T09:15:59+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-10-12T09:15:59+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28436#p28436</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28436#p28436"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28436#p28436"><![CDATA[
Dear all,<br /><br />i tried to follow instructions from this link:<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/doku.php?id=robotics:computing:xenomai_install_on_roboard">http://geonobot-wiki.toile-libre.org/do ... on_roboard</a><!-- m --><br /><br />do i have to apply roboard kernel provided by roboard site after installing xenomai?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2352">d3xt3r13</a> — Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:15 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[d3xt3r13]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-10-07T08:53:08+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-10-07T08:53:08+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28393#p28393</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28393#p28393"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28393#p28393"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>matt.stevenson wrote:</cite><br />Have you tried applying the roboard patch first then the rtai?<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />yes, i did both way but still failed to boot. did you have any related work on this thing that you can share?<br /><br />i'm currently working on xenomai, hope this one works<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2352">d3xt3r13</a> — Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:53 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[matt.stevenson]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-10-06T22:44:09+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-10-06T22:44:09+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28390#p28390</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28390#p28390"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28390#p28390"><![CDATA[
Have you tried applying the roboard patch first then the rtai?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2093">matt.stevenson</a> — Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:44 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[d3xt3r13]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-10-03T07:46:13+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-10-03T07:46:13+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28339#p28339</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28339#p28339"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28339#p28339"><![CDATA[
my board failed to boot after patched with RTAI. is there anyone can help or share experience using RTAI on RB100?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2352">d3xt3r13</a> — Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:46 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[d3xt3r13]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-09-29T08:39:56+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-09-29T08:39:56+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28303#p28303</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28303#p28303"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[[Ask] Real Time Kernel Patch]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6612&amp;p=28303#p28303"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>roboard wrote:</cite><br />hi,<br /><br />In theory, it will work that use the roboard kernel and then apply RTAI patch.<br /><br />But, we have not tried it.<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />RTAI patch need a fresh kernel so i'm going with RTAI first then apply roboard patch. It's on progress, i'll share the result ASAP<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2352">d3xt3r13</a> — Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:39 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>