<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=17&amp;t=7254" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2011-06-07T16:53:57+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=17&amp;t=7254</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Andy2011]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-06-07T16:53:57+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-06-07T16:53:57+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31464#p31464</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31464#p31464"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[thread generation(top velocity)]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31464#p31464"><![CDATA[
I am sorry i dont want 1MHz with 1 Khz i will be happy enough, i think the real time idea could be good, thought.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2680">Andy2011</a> — Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:53 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[roboard]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-06-07T04:28:40+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-06-07T04:28:40+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31455#p31455</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31455#p31455"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: thread generation(top velocity)]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31455#p31455"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />you may employ a real-time kernel for higher context-switching rate. But in general, for both WinXP &amp; Linux, it is difficult to get 1MHz context switching.<br /><br /><img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1542">roboard</a> — Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:28 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Andy2011]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-06-06T09:23:43+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-06-06T09:23:43+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31448#p31448</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31448#p31448"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[thread generation(top velocity)]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7254&amp;p=31448#p31448"><![CDATA[
Hello <br /><br />I am working with a RB-110 with an Ubuntu running as O.S. I have a developed a program to control a quadrotor that is composed of several threads(one for sensoring and actuation, one for communication, one for control and so on). I have realized that my top speed of the threads is 250 Hz i can not go any faster, is this normal? That is the top frequency of the computer, i will like to get to 1MHz.<br /><br /><br />Thank you very much.<br /><br />Andreu<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2680">Andy2011</a> — Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:23 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>