<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1238" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2007-03-26T21:59:08+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1238</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[PaulP]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-03-26T21:59:08+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-03-26T21:59:08+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8205#p8205</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8205#p8205"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[KHR-2HV [Some questions]]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8205#p8205"><![CDATA[
The KHR-2HV is the older bot, the KHR-1HV is the newer one and has more DOF (hip rotation). The 1HV has only been around since christmas and has  quite quickly sold out.<br /><br />I believe there is to be an upgraded RCB on any new ones due out.<br /><br />Programming is an issue as there is no definitive document of the protocol and that which has been worked out is somewhat scratchy and inaccurate.<br /><br />Certain documented functions dont work and as the RCB doesnt have a true UART it makes comms timing difficult.<br /><br />I think I am right in saying that none of the 'commercial' robots represented here have a true API, only what has been developed by the users. In some cases with considerable effort.<br /><br />If you are into external programming then there is a wealth of information both here and at LynxMotion. <br /><br />I personally have gone that route and dropped the RCB altogether.<br /><br />There is an adjacent thread where I have shown some of the things I've done with my 1HV.<br /><br />Don't get me wrong though, all these commercial bots have been made to do some quite spectacular things with the onboard processor with no external interface whatsoever.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=484">PaulP</a> — Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:59 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Modereso]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-03-26T21:23:34+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-03-26T21:23:34+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8203#p8203</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8203#p8203"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[KHR-2HV [Some questions]]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;p=8203#p8203"><![CDATA[
Hello<br /><br />I'm thinking of purchasing the KHR-2HV and want to ask a few questions before I part with any cash (understandably).<br /><br />1) What is the <span style="font-weight: bold">difference</span> between the 1HV and 2HV? From what I have seen I'm better off going with the 2HV.<br /><br />2) How flexible are these machines when it comes to intergration and programmability? I'm not after one just because they are smart platforms, but I would like to be able to program and intergrate my own software in C++ (COM's and API's etc) to control my HR-2HV. I see this has already been done, but part of my personal goal is the chance to sharpen up my skills using external programmable platforms (what a fantastic way to do it)!<br /><br />3) Input ports would utilize optional sensory I take it?<br /><br />Whilst I appreciate most of these questions have already been answered, I don't yet own the machine and just want to make sure.<br /><br />Cheers<br /><br />Mode<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=572">Modereso</a> — Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:23 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>