<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1352" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2007-06-03T00:23:45+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1352</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Bob]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-06-03T00:23:45+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-06-03T00:23:45+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=9308#p9308</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=9308#p9308"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[KHR-2 and XBEE]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=9308#p9308"><![CDATA[
Has anybody made any further progress on the issue of using the XBEE to control the KHR-2?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=300">Bob</a> — Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:23 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[edmen]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-05-05T08:54:09+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-05-05T08:54:09+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=8859#p8859</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=8859#p8859"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[XBEE – Communications with KHR 2 Information Summary]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1352&amp;p=8859#p8859"><![CDATA[
<span style="font-size: 150%; line-height: 116%;"><span style="font-weight: bold">XBEE – Communications with KHR 2 Information Summary</span></span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">The problem – </span>the KHR 2 has an umbilical cord this can make more mobile actions dependant on the umbilical cords distance limitations.<br /><br />Standard Bluetooth communication on the RCB3 –J is problematic and almost on the impossible scale.<br /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/images/Main-BlueSMiRF-Extended-1.jpg" alt="Image" /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Using a <a href="http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=582" class="postlink">BlueSmirf</a> from SparkFun has been concluded by Shsan’s research/experiments  and others that Bluetooth inherently cannot allow proper transmission of the RCB3-J packet protocol which it uses. This is because the communication from the RCB3 is timing specific.  <a href="http://www.lessieux.com/mywiki/index.php?title=Bluetooth_KHR2" class="postlink">Shsan’s website</a> explains more on the behavior of the RCB3 communication under an Oscilloscope  <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />And  as PaulP  on his post Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:55 pm <a href="http://robosavvy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1152" class="postlink">here</a> <br /> <br /><blockquote class="uncited"><div><br />“Bluetooth has byte gaps and latency problems. This can cause data problems on those robots that have a very strict timing protocol.” (PaulP)<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Which is true so Bluetooth is out as a possible solution for a wireless RCB3 communications link between RCB3 and a PC.<br /><br /> <br /><br /><img src="http://www.maxstream.net/images/products/grey-bg-xbee.jpg" alt="Image" /><br /><br /><br /><br />So another possible solution is the <a href="http://www.maxstream.net/products/xbee/xbee-oem-rf-module-zigbee.php" class="postlink">XBEE</a><br />The XBEE is has been in fact used on other robots such as the infamous ROBONOVA-I &amp; Hitec<br /><br /><a href="http://robosavvy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=382&amp;highlight=zigbee" class="postlink">Look here</a> <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold">Wireless Communication with XBee Radios </span><br />Practical Example <a href="http://itp.nyu.edu/~raf275/meshnetworking/XBee/XBee_example.html" class="postlink">HERE</a>   in this example they used a PIC microcontroller.<br />Is a really good example of how simple they are to implement<br /><br /> <br />Well that concludes this little summary of what information so far has been gathered of the wireless problem.<br /><br />Edward Arreola<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=499">edmen</a> — Sat May 05, 2007 8:54 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>