<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1868" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2007-12-13T19:31:09+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=2&amp;t=1868</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[wintermute]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-12-13T19:31:09+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-12-13T19:31:09+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12816#p12816</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12816#p12816"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[R-BlueLink]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12816#p12816"><![CDATA[
It seems to be very adept at scuttling about using a bent-kneed crouching shuffle, similar to many Robo1 designs.  This method of locomotion is no doubt chosen for stability.  But personally, I feel that the shuffle-gait, no matter how well executed, is antithetical to the concept of a humanoid robot.  You don't see high-end bipeds moving in this unrealistic fashion; they use a striding walk.  If stability is the primary goal, why stop at a bent-kneed crouching shuffle?  A robot on all fours would be more stable yet.  But that wouldn't replicate human locomotion, and neither does this.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=771">wintermute</a> — Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:31 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[zaboomafuu]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-12-13T18:40:55+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-12-13T18:40:55+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12814#p12814</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12814#p12814"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[R-BlueLink]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12814#p12814"><![CDATA[
I like it think he is using 4 servos in the knees or just double linking it for stability I cant play the video slow enough to get a really good look at it<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=497">zaboomafuu</a> — Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:40 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Ray]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-03T11:36:01+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-03T11:36:01+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12003#p12003</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12003#p12003"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[R-BlueLink]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1868&amp;p=12003#p12003"><![CDATA[
Hi, a interesting Robot designed by the designer of KHR,<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://supermachine.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2007/11/rbluelink_3846.html">http://supermachine.cocolog-nifty.com/b ... _3846.html</a><!-- m --><br /><br />interesting leg structure ( a four bar chair structure? ) <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif" alt=":P" title="Razz" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=145">Ray</a> — Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:36 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>