<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=21&amp;t=7554" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2011-10-27T23:47:57+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=21&amp;t=7554</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[i-Bot]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-10-27T23:47:57+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-10-27T23:47:57+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32663#p32663</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32663#p32663"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Smartness of the toy robots]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32663#p32663"><![CDATA[
I think it is the quality of the questions, not the technique:<br /><br /><br />&quot;love of dolphins&quot; pah, these were students ( 70's ?).<br /><br /><br />Do you have your own room ?<br /><br />Can you get both me and you there after 10 pints ( you buy your own) ?<br /><br />How many watts is your stereo ?<br /><br />Is there a takeaway near your place ?<br /><br />Do you mind if I ..... ?<br /><br />And the imperfect product was always more fun.<br /><br />So I agree the poll is likely flawed, because it incorrectly already assumes too much about i-toys. Ask the wrong questions and get the wrong answers. A future i-toy is likely as much a social tool as simply a technical capability<br />Maybe questions should be added like:<br /><br />Can it be my pal ?<br /><br />Will my mates consider it awesome ?<br /><br />Can it inflict hideous damage to other robots ?<br /><br />Should my robot be less smart or more smart than me ?<br /><br />Should a robot have physical human attributes ?<br /><br />Does it have its own room ? OOPs here we go again !<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=159">i-Bot</a> — Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:47 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[limor]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-10-27T19:46:03+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-10-27T19:46:03+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32654#p32654</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32654#p32654"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Smartness of the toy robots]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32654#p32654"><![CDATA[
when i was in Uni, long time ago, there was a popular pre-internet computerized subscription match-making service/game for students that started as a physiology department experiment and within weeks had many thousands of student participating.<br />You filled in a poll (similar to this robot toy one) scoring the importance of over 200 things related to your dream partner/date.<br />For each item, you had to give your data/opinion, the data/opinion that your ideal partner should have, and how much weight to give this item in the overall matching score.<br />Examples of included: height, hair color, ethnicity, religion, education, music, sport, adventurousness, &quot;love for dolphins&quot; etc.<br />You would then receive once a week by mail a letter with contact details of one to five high scoring matched partners.<br />The matched partners conformed perfectly to the exhaustive scoring system. She/he had the perfect eye color, height, love for music and dolphins, socio-economic background and passions. However, they were usually disappointingly far off from what one expected.<br /><br /><br />The moral of the story is that a poll scoring people's ideal robot toy may not be the way to spec out the perfect product.<br /><br /> <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">limor</a> — Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:46 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[zahx]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-10-27T14:48:49+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-10-27T14:48:49+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32649#p32649</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32649#p32649"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Smartness of the toy robots]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=7554&amp;p=32649#p32649"><![CDATA[
You know. It's very interesting what the people think about the features of the robots. So I decide to make a short interesting poll.<br />This poll is about features that make the toy-robot smart. About what features are more important for the definition of the smartness of toy robot.<br /><br />So please try to fill out this pull. It won't take a lot of time.<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/539614">http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/539614</a><!-- m --><br /><br />And of course it's interesting to read your thourts and discuss them!<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2974">zahx</a> — Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:48 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>