<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=23&amp;t=6944" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2011-01-21T23:06:23+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=23&amp;t=6944</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[billyzelsnack]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-01-21T23:06:23+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-01-21T23:06:23+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29887#p29887</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29887#p29887"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Thing o Matic versus Cupcake Printing Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29887#p29887"><![CDATA[
haha.<br /><br />They also didn't mention to whether it was a cupcake with a MK4 or MK5, though maybe it does not matter since that does look like a lot of z-wobble in the print.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=459">billyzelsnack</a> — Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:06 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Fritzoid]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-01-21T20:01:42+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-01-21T20:01:42+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29886#p29886</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29886#p29886"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Thing o Matic versus Cupcake Printing Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29886#p29886"><![CDATA[
Hey, that's not a fair comparison... the bottom one's upside down <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=438">Fritzoid</a> — Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:01 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[robosavvy]]></name></author>
<updated>2011-01-21T16:55:45+01:00</updated>
<published>2011-01-21T16:55:45+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29884#p29884</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29884#p29884"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Thing o Matic versus Cupcake Printing Quality]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6944&amp;p=29884#p29884"><![CDATA[
Hi<br /><br />Recently the Makerbot blog has posted a picture with a comparison build of the new Makerbot and the its predecessor the Cupcake:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="color: green">&quot;One of the more frequent questions people would ask us at CES was “what’s the difference between a Thing-O-Matic and a Cupcake?” We’d tell them about the improved Z stage travel, microstepping, mechanical endstops, etc. but sometimes it’s easier to show than tell:&quot;</span></span><br /><br /><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5007/5355886784_1394567550_z.jpg" alt="Image" /><br /><br />Thing-O-Matic on top, Cupcake below.<br /><br />RoboSavvy<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3">robosavvy</a> — Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:55 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>