<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=14229" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2017-02-19T21:50:25+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=14229</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[robojohn]]></name></author>
<updated>2017-02-19T21:50:25+01:00</updated>
<published>2017-02-19T21:50:25+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43743#p43743</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43743#p43743"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Cap Gemini report about humanoids in retail]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43743#p43743"><![CDATA[
I thinks it's too early for this. I am a huge fan of robots but honestly, I am a little bit scared of it at the same time. I've watched Matrix too many times.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=8178">robojohn</a> — Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:50 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[PaulL]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-08-02T07:32:18+01:00</updated>
<published>2016-08-02T07:32:18+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43714#p43714</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43714#p43714"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Cap Gemini report about humanoids in retail]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43714#p43714"><![CDATA[
I think their assumptions are naive!! What they're suggesting would be much like a mobile kiosk. If a computer-based stationary kiosk was possible (and clearly, it is), why hasn't this been done already, as a first step? Certainly, it would be cheaper!! Perhaps they'd be better suited by tapping an existing resource for infrastructure - like one's cell phone. It would be handy to have an app, tell it what you want, have it give you a graphic overlay through one's cam of directions on where to go in the store to get there, which shelf, etc, product info, store pricing, etc. Consumer owns the hardware!! Sadly, I think a robot greeter / guide would be more gimmick than real value-add. Wait - in the trend of the trendy, why not have self-driving CARTS in the store that would route customers to their destinations?? They already have scooters in stores, and it is a controlled and closed system, one could do something as simple as a line-following mechanism on the floor... On a more serious note, I think having a LITERAL Spam Bot would be unbelievably annoying!! &quot;You look tired - perhaps you would use a nice hot cup of Super Duper Coffee...&quot;, &quot;I see you drove up in an XYZ - have you considered buying a newer car, like an ABC? They have a deal down the street... blah blah blah&quot;, or &quot;I know you're here to buy X, but take a look at Y that I've brought you to! Isn't this a nice Y? And check out that PRICE!!&quot;, etc, etc.<br /><br />I think robots have their place, but I don't think customer-facing retail is one of them!! <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /> As much as I have an affinity towards robots, I certainly don't want to talk to one that is feeding me spam with a corporate agenda. I think there's value in talking to a person, a creature we know well enough to determine (mostly) whether they're being deceptive or not. Another thought - how many &quot;hate crimes&quot; towards robots would be realized through an ad bot?? Spam ticks me off - I can't imagine how I'd feel if the delivery mechanism for that spam presented itself in physical form!! Such bots should be well wrapped to take a pounding, I'd think!!<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=741">PaulL</a> — Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:32 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[limor]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-07-29T10:28:15+01:00</updated>
<published>2016-07-29T10:28:15+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43712#p43712</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43712#p43712"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cap Gemini report about humanoids in retail]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229&amp;p=43712#p43712"><![CDATA[
Seeing a report by Cap Gemini about humanoid robots use case in retail is like seeing an advertisement for a self-driving car SLA based subscription service. I just didn't think we were there quite yet. I'm guessing Softbank can afford to have analysts cover the niche sector if they can afford to buy ARM.<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/sites/aldebaran/files/capgemini_consulting_humanoid_robots_in_the_retail_industry.pdf">https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/si ... dustry.pdf</a><!-- m --><br /><br />aldebaran-robots.png<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">limor</a> — Fri Jul 29, 2016 10:28 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>