<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=1933" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2007-11-18T00:46:21+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=1933</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Gort]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-18T00:46:21+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-18T00:46:21+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12425#p12425</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12425#p12425"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robo Development Speech]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12425#p12425"><![CDATA[
Here is a link to the Trossen Robotics website and the Trossen Robotics System that he talks about.<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.trossenrobotics.com/tutorials/trossenroboticssystem.aspx">http://www.trossenrobotics.com/tutorial ... ystem.aspx</a><!-- m --><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=174">Gort</a> — Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:46 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Gort]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-18T00:41:33+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-18T00:41:33+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12424#p12424</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12424#p12424"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robo Development Speech]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12424#p12424"><![CDATA[
I like the idea that no matter what robot I bought. I would know already how to program it. You just have to make sure that standards do not limit creativity.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=174">Gort</a> — Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:41 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Droid Works]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-18T00:28:01+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-18T00:28:01+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12423#p12423</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12423#p12423"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robo Development Speech]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12423#p12423"><![CDATA[
Its because robotics engineers have been thinking the same way about robotics since the beginning, and don't want to adapt to new ways of thinking. Just like every new technology there is resistance first then acceptance. Not so long ago people were put to death for saying the earth is not flat...lol A good idea is a good idea and I think this will be the new standard in robotics. Just imagine plug and play robotics. How amazing would that be <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=714">Droid Works</a> — Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:28 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Gort]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-18T00:14:40+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-18T00:14:40+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12422#p12422</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12422#p12422"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robo Development Speech]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12422#p12422"><![CDATA[
I have watch almost all of the videos and think that he was a lot of good points. We talks a lot about object orientated programming which I wish that I could do with my robonova. I am not sure why the engineers at the conference are so hostile to software developers though. A robot platform like the RN which you program in a object orientated language would be a big boom to robotics.  <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" title="Very Happy" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=174">Gort</a> — Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:14 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Gort]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-17T20:06:41+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-17T20:06:41+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12416#p12416</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12416#p12416"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Robo Development Speech]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=1933&amp;p=12416#p12416"><![CDATA[
Check out the speech by the owner of trossen robotics.<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsPfGOFAtcQ">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsPfGOFAtcQ</a><!-- m --><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=174">Gort</a> — Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:06 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>