<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=6865" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2010-12-21T16:18:36+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=3&amp;t=6865</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[billyzelsnack]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-12-21T16:18:36+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-12-21T16:18:36+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29441#p29441</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29441#p29441"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Aldebaran launching 1.4m high humanoid at EUR 250k]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29441#p29441"><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="uncited"><div><br />But most humanoid robots use motor and gears to power their joints, and these mechanisms are not backdrivable—due to energy losses in the gears and you can’t relate the electrical current in the motors to force. That’s why they need force sensors if you want to move in a compliant way; it’s called active compliance. Romeo is different. It has no gears. We transmit the motion from the motors to the joints using screws and cables. This system is backdrivable.<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Since when is a screw not a gear? I guess they are using a ballscrew, but are ballscrews really all that backdrivable compared to a spur based gearbox?<br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.roton.com/application_engineering.aspx#11">http://www.roton.com/application_engineering.aspx#11</a><!-- m --><br /><br />Seems like a regular spur gear setup can achieve similar backdriveability efficiency.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=459">billyzelsnack</a> — Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:18 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[limor]]></name></author>
<updated>2010-12-21T09:57:05+01:00</updated>
<published>2010-12-21T09:57:05+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29437#p29437</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29437#p29437"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Aldebaran launching 1.4m high humanoid at EUR 250k]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&amp;p=29437#p29437"><![CDATA[
intended for elderly and disabled wealthy individuals who will prefer to spend their time and money in the company of a robot with soft torso <br /><br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/france-developing-advanced-humanoid-robot-romeo">http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robo ... obot-romeo</a><!-- m --><br /><br /><img src="http://spectrum.ieee.org/image/1749400" alt="Image" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">limor</a> — Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:57 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>