<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=5&amp;t=2353" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2008-03-27T13:19:47+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=5&amp;t=2353</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[siempre.aprendiendo]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-03-27T13:19:47+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-03-27T13:19:47+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=15000#p15000</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=15000#p15000"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[CM-2+ advantages?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=15000#p15000"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>Bullit wrote:</cite><br />It does not have all MCU I/O on a header.  I have several of these and that is one of the disappointing things that they changed from the CM-2.<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Yes, it is a pity. It was the main interest for me, as a platform to learning about microcontrollers <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" title="Sad" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=698">siempre.aprendiendo</a> — Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:19 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Bullit]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-03-18T21:12:05+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-03-18T21:12:05+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14868#p14868</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14868#p14868"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[CM-2+ advantages?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14868#p14868"><![CDATA[
It does not have all MCU I/O on a header.  I have several of these and that is one of the disappointing things that they changed from the CM-2.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=173">Bullit</a> — Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:12 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[siempre.aprendiendo]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-03-18T14:50:59+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-03-18T14:50:59+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14861#p14861</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14861#p14861"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[CM-2+ advantages?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=2353&amp;p=14861#p14861"><![CDATA[
Which are the advantages/benefits of CM2+?<br /><br />I have read these:<br /><br />- RS485<br />- has ALL mcu I/O available at an IDC Header<br /><br /><br />Any other? The price is 2x+ than CM-5 <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=698">siempre.aprendiendo</a> — Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:50 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>