Even if you expose the SDA/SCL pins the timing of a slave is much more difficult to that of a master. Given the CM-5 is pretty busy serving a 1M serial bus, you are likely to have problems.
This is why I prefer to use the CM5. The price between a CM5 and make a card with ATMEGA128L and components is more expensive.
Even if you expose the SDA/SCL pins the timing of a slave is much more difficult to that of a master. Given the CM-5 is pretty busy serving a 1M serial bus, you are likely to have problems.
In fact, I found a C library that supports the I2C So I thought ...
As the card is equipped ATMEGA128L level hardware I thought that with the planned interruptions management was all alone.
In addition to the maximum management will be on the side of the CM5. (Implementation of a protocol between the CM5 software and map). It's just a party to introduce software largest assessed PC
What is you I2C bus master ? How intelligent is its I2C interface ? How will it respond to long clock holds ?
It's a SerializerWL Interface. And I think that a clock it's 400MHz.
In fact I like the sensors from bioloid but I do not have enough knowledge of programming to low-performing and things interesting with the CM5.
In addition zigbee module uses a proprietary standard, which does not allow the Zigbee operate satisfactorily without putting your hands in the really fat "(French-speaking)
Thank you for your set guards, and I will think before doing anything.
In your opinion, if I make a map specially provided for the conversion between UART and I2C / TTL, is it better.
But in this case should be that you m'aiguilles a little on research should I do next Hardware (because for me ...).
Alzb92
Statistics: Posted by alzb92 — Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:57 pm
]]>
