<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=5&amp;t=4202" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2009-10-10T16:48:15+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=5&amp;t=4202</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[i-Bot]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-10T16:48:15+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-10T16:48:15+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22248#p22248</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22248#p22248"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22248#p22248"><![CDATA[
I am not sure that your simulation demands a very accurate measurement.<br /><br />Based on the other servos, I would suggest that the COM along the long axis of the servo and parallel to the servo output shaft will lie in a central plane.. The COM along the long axis a right angles to the servo output shaft ( parallel to output disk will be shifted towards the output disk because the gears are that end and the electronics at the other ( maybe 60/40 ratio).<br /><br />About the short axis, the motor is at one end and the output shaft at the other. The motor is heavier, so I would estimate again about 60/40 ratio.<br /><br />While awaiting true data, I suggest you tstart with these valuse and do a sensitivity check on the simulation.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=159">i-Bot</a> — Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:48 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Suicidal.Banana]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-10T15:18:53+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-10T15:18:53+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22245#p22245</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22245#p22245"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22245#p22245"><![CDATA[
not that it matters alot, but might be better to call it COG, center of gravity, since COM already reffers to your com-port.<br />Ontopic; sorry i dont know, if you/some1 find out please share<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1517">Suicidal.Banana</a> — Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:18 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[NEVER]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-10T06:12:53+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-10T06:12:53+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22239#p22239</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22239#p22239"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22239#p22239"><![CDATA[
Yes, By COM I mean Center of mass.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1147">NEVER</a> — Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:12 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[i-Bot]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-10T01:11:39+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-10T01:11:39+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22237#p22237</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22237#p22237"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22237#p22237"><![CDATA[
I was thinking COM was Centre of Mass.<br /><br />If someone can send me some freebies, I am happy to measure it. I should probably have a dozen of each for about 2 years to get statistically significant results and be sure it doesn't change over time !<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=159">i-Bot</a> — Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:11 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[limor]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-10T00:49:43+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-10T00:49:43+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22234#p22234</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22234#p22234"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22234#p22234"><![CDATA[
by COM do you mean communications / protocol / interface ?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">limor</a> — Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:49 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[NEVER]]></name></author>
<updated>2009-10-09T07:52:24+01:00</updated>
<published>2009-10-09T07:52:24+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22224#p22224</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22224#p22224"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[COM of the Ex-106 and Rx-64]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=4202&amp;p=22224#p22224"><![CDATA[
hi,<br /><br />I am doing a project on 3D simulation of a Robot. Has someone figured out the COM of the Robotis motors?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1147">NEVER</a> — Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:52 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>