<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=6&amp;t=737" />

<title>RoboSavvy Forum</title>
<subtitle>Robosavvy Forum: The largest online community of Humanoid Robot Builders</subtitle>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/index.php" />
<updated>2008-08-20T01:01:07+01:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[RoboSavvy Forum]]></name></author>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/feed.php?f=6&amp;t=737</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Robo1]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-08-20T01:01:07+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-08-20T01:01:07+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17279#p17279</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17279#p17279"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17279#p17279"><![CDATA[
The hands look really nice would love be build a set.  Just finished making the head for my home build should post some picture next week when it's up and running.<br /><br />Bren<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=216">Robo1</a> — Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:01 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Layton]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-08-20T00:40:34+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-08-20T00:40:34+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17278#p17278</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17278#p17278"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17278#p17278"><![CDATA[
I believe the servos have been changed for the RB2000 but I will definitely have to look into that.  Screenshots of the RB2000 software seem to indicate that you can dial the servos precisely.<br /><br />I'm modeling him in Maya (I come from a game art background) but I will post an .obj file which anyone should be able to convert to their needs.  I agree with the OP in that such a project should be open source, so to speak to benefit the community.<br /><br />It will probably be a little while before I can post it though because I will need to sort out at least how the shells will fit together.  I have some ideas about using snap-fit type extrusions that can be slid and locked into place for certain areas, but I'm not used to such precise technical modeling so I'll need to figure this stuff out as I go.  I'll post progress pictures once I get into it.<br /><br />Depending on the measurements of the servos and boards ppl might use, the internal structures to hold things in place will need to be done by each individual.  I will post my own solution but I will be interested to see how others do it too.  As you mentioned before the wiring is going to be another issue.<br /><br />By the way, this is a good example of the kind of hand I would like to build for him: <a href="http://www.lynxmotion.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1004" class="postlink">http://www.lynxmotion.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=1004</a><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1081">Layton</a> — Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:40 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Robo1]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-08-19T12:25:46+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-08-19T12:25:46+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17266#p17266</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17266#p17266"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17266#p17266"><![CDATA[
Hi Have a look at <a href="http://robosavvy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=800&amp;start=0" class="postlink">here</a>.  Haven't uploaded any more pictures for this as I'm in the process of installing a screen for the head.  <br /><br />Just a thought about using the RB2000, can you get the servo positions from the servos I remember this being the problem with the original RB1800.  would love to have a play with the QRIO files once you have them up and running in CAD could you post them in STEP or offer files.<br /><br />Bren<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=216">Robo1</a> — Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:25 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Layton]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-08-19T10:59:37+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-08-19T10:59:37+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17265#p17265</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17265#p17265"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=17265#p17265"><![CDATA[
Ok so I started with a QRIO schematic to sort out the number and placement of servos.  I figure 28 servos total (the hands will use 1 servo each and have a basic gripping ability).<br /><br />I plan on using the RB2000 as a base and will use higher torque servos in the shoulders and legs (the RB2000 kit I'm looking at comes with 19 servos, so the other 9 I will need to order as a pack, might as well get the more powerful ones).<br /><br />The nice thing about the RB2000 is it has a speaker and 16 ch LED support, which should be enough to do the lights in his eyes, ears, and chest without any multiplexing.<br /><br />I haven't started the modeling process yet, but based on my rough measurements the robot will be about 40cm tall (or 2:3 scale of the actual QRIO).<br /><br />One concern I have is that the shoulder rotations, if limited to 180 degrees, won't offer the same fluidity as the real QRIO.  I'm still keen to go ahead with the project, but ideally servos with 270 degrees would be used for the shoulders to give him a nice broad range of motion in them (if you watch videos of QRIO getting up from a fall, both on his back or on his stomach, you will see about 270 degrees of rotation there).  180 degrees is fine for the rest of the joints though.  <br /><br />So if anyone knows anything about 270 degree digital servos, post about it please.  Oh, and Bren if you feel like it post up some photos of your custom bot.  I'd love to check him out. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1081">Layton</a> — Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:59 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Robo1]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-07-15T13:37:25+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-07-15T13:37:25+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16880#p16880</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16880#p16880"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16880#p16880"><![CDATA[
I'm still working on the bot if you I took it to the UK robo-one meet the offer week.  working on adding pressure sensors for the feet to try out some ZMP measurements.<br /><br />Bren<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=216">Robo1</a> — Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:37 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Layton]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-07-14T22:10:33+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-07-14T22:10:33+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16862#p16862</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16862#p16862"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16862#p16862"><![CDATA[
Hey Bren, looks like you were onto something but the posts date from last year.  Whatever happened with your build?  Was it just too difficult to do or was it more a factor of time?  It looked like a cool custom bot in your render, a little like ZMP's Nuvo.<br /><br />As far as the servo cables go I don't think there is much issue, assuming the parts are hollow enough there should be room for them.  I come from a game art background and not an engineering one so I'm more concerned about how I'll manage to get all the parts to fit together nicely and attach to the servos.  But with an accurate 3d model of the base parts and enough elbow grease it shouldn't be impossible (though perhaps improbable).  <br /><br />On the plus side, if I can't get things to work at least I'd have the option of printing a cool little QRIO figure model. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" title="Wink" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1081">Layton</a> — Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:10 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Robo1]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-07-14T21:56:18+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-07-14T21:56:18+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16861#p16861</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16861#p16861"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16861#p16861"><![CDATA[
Alright layton<br /><br />Have a look at this <a href="http://robosavvy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=800&amp;start=0" class="postlink">this</a>.  The only problem you will have is how do you drive these joints.  its all well and good having a 3d model of the robot but have you thought about how you will run the cables through the joints (slip ring).  How you will drive these joints so that you get 3DOF around the same point (pulls).  those are the difficult part.<br /><br />just my thoughts.  To help you out theres a model of a RN1 and KHR knocking around this site and over at tribotix theres files for the most servos.<br /><br />Good luck Bren<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=216">Robo1</a> — Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:56 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Layton]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-07-14T21:05:34+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-07-14T21:05:34+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16860#p16860</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16860#p16860"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=16860#p16860"><![CDATA[
I'm fairly good at 3d modeling and I'm considering making a 3d version of QRIO that could then be printed using rapid-prototyping printers.  My problem is that if I am going to build it in 3d I need to first look at a base robot like the KHR-1HV and see how it can be modified to better fit the proportions of QRIO.  I'm not even talking about things like voice recognition or smooth motions.  I just want to build a small robot that can walk and move around with a sleek exterior similar to QRIOs.  Maybe include some LEDs in the head and chest and a small camera so that it can output images/video to an external pc.  But I am a complete n00b at the robotics stuff so that will have to wait awhile.  <br /><br />In the meantime, maybe I will get to work modeling QRIO.  He is a complex and smartly-engineered little guy, with lots of interconnecting parts and details.  But I think its doable, I've seen a decent version of him on one of those pay-to-download 3d model file sites, but since I can do 3D I see no point in paying the $150 charge for it. <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" />  Whenever I get around to completing it I will share the data.  Once printed, I could even create molds so that others could have copies of the parts.  A little silver paint, and...<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1081">Layton</a> — Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:05 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Humanoido]]></name></author>
<updated>2008-04-04T16:24:28+01:00</updated>
<published>2008-04-04T16:24:28+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=15189#p15189</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=15189#p15189"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=15189#p15189"><![CDATA[
You could probably get a hold of a Qrio and duplicate it.<br /><br />humanoido<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=416">Humanoido</a> — Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:24 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[wthierry]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-11-07T17:15:05+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-11-07T17:15:05+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=12094#p12094</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=12094#p12094"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[QRIO on a budget]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=12094#p12094"><![CDATA[
Im rather new to all this, but wouldnt the easiest way to build a QRIO be to use one of the existing biped robots add some sensors and then link to a computer via 802.11 which processes and tells the robot what to do and how to react.  This way your robot can be controlled by a fast machine but have low overhead on the robot.  This is my first post, so please dont flame me if im being too simplistic.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=792">wthierry</a> — Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:15 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Humanoido]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-01-24T08:40:23+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-01-24T08:40:23+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=6450#p6450</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=6450#p6450"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=6450#p6450"><![CDATA[
I agree that we're seeing just the beginning (actually second beginning) of humanoid robotics. I had looked at scaling up several of my robots and encountered several obstacles - money, parts, and a small lightweight power source.<br /><br />Already we are seeing some improvements in software using the existing humanoid platforms, making the motions more smooth. One of my priorities is getting my robots to walk smoother and make them more human-like.<br /><br />Processing power is another thing. I've waited 50 years, and still, the processors are, well, not powerful enough. I'm talking about handling intelligence and all the humanoid functions. At least we can use small microcontrollers and connect them together on our current budgets. I think the Federal Government should give us free grant money to continue our humanoid research and projects.<br /><br />Evolution... have patience, we'll get there.  <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif" alt=":D" title="Very Happy" /> <br />Humanoido<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=416">Humanoido</a> — Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:40 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[JonHylands]]></name></author>
<updated>2007-01-05T05:48:36+01:00</updated>
<published>2007-01-05T05:48:36+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5745#p5745</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5745#p5745"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5745#p5745"><![CDATA[
I think its doable (building something like Qrio in a RoboOne size), but you need to offload the serious processing to a PC. Put embedded controllers onboard to handle high-frequency motion control, and feed that over a high-bandwidth Wifi link from a PC. Send wireless video from the robot to the PC, and run something like OpenCV or RoboRealm or Mavis or whatever for vision processing.<br /><br />- Jon<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=373">JonHylands</a> — Fri Jan 05, 2007 5:48 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[RamDragon]]></name></author>
<updated>2006-12-04T05:10:38+01:00</updated>
<published>2006-12-04T05:10:38+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5006#p5006</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5006#p5006"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=5006#p5006"><![CDATA[
I doubt it'll be any time soon that we see a Qrio style robot for sale on Wal-Mart shelves. Hell, since Sony killed their whole robot program, it'll be even longer. <br /><br />Still, the autonomous functions it had makes you wonder what you could do with a few hundred a year to toy around with. Wireless, self-charging dock, learning abilities, audio commands, visual recognition... it's easy to see why the dream. Still, most of it's software, and I'm not sure that networked controllers isn't the way to go to achieve the smooth fluid motion, which dictates a larger frame anyway. <br /><br />I mean, it's all fine to want to build within the Robo-1 guidelines, but I'm really waiting for someone to build a 20 foot tall robot to go push over the Neogentronyx heap. I'd do it myself, but I misplaced my $100,000 bill.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=410">RamDragon</a> — Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:10 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[heke]]></name></author>
<updated>2006-11-06T21:48:34+01:00</updated>
<published>2006-11-06T21:48:34+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4579#p4579</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4579#p4579"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4579#p4579"><![CDATA[
I think we haven't seen yet what Kondo-robots, Bioloid and others can really do. Same thing with Commodore 64 long time ago: at first it was only a blue screen (a good thing at the time), but in the end we saw jaw-dropping demos.<br /><br />Of course our simple robots can not reach the skills of Qrio ever. But little by little we can see more smooth motions when the programmers brush up their programming skills and when they learn more about their simple robots.<br /><br />A dual-core laptop is nowadays sold in every super-market. Sooner or later a Qrio-style robot will be sold similar way. But time for that is not yet.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=263">heke</a> — Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:48 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Chemical]]></name></author>
<updated>2006-11-06T21:08:29+01:00</updated>
<published>2006-11-06T21:08:29+01:00</published>
<id>http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4578#p4578</id>
<link href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4578#p4578"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[Home Built Qrio?]]></title>

<content type="html" xml:base="http://forum.robosavvy.com/viewtopic.php?t=737&amp;p=4578#p4578"><![CDATA[
Probably everyone here could make something like a qrio.... if it wasn't for a little thing called money  <img src="http://forum.robosavvy.com/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" /><br /><br />With alot of work you could buy the parts, build, mold, program something very similar to QRIO with amazing technolodgy, but it costs money, alot of it. And thats why you don't see anything like QRIO in homebuilt, the same reason school kids make Go Karts and not sports cars.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://forum.robosavvy.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=104">Chemical</a> — Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:08 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>