by tempusmaster » Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:56 am
by tempusmaster
Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:56 am
DirtyRoboto wrote:Do any of the Manoi owners here have other bipeds?
If so, then how does the Manoi compare?
A MANOI AT01, Kondo KHR-1 (upgraded to the RCB-3), and a couple others. I've posted extensively about the AT01, so it probably isn't useful to repeat all that here.
I am reading alot of comments about the overall balance of the robot and wonder how modding the bot will effect balance. I guess you would have to code new moves for every addition of weight!
It depends on how extensive the mods are. It's a combination of the weight and geometry. Adding more weight at the robots COG doesn't make as much difference as adding weight far from the COG.
For example, I've added weight (additional boards and accessories) to the AT01 body and didn't have to do more than just minor adjustments to the motions. But when I added grippers to the ends of each arm the necessary motion adjustments were fairly major.
The RN1 seems much less sensitive to inaccurate zeroing, does this mean it was designed towards a begginer to intermediate person.
There are several factors at work. You're correct in assuming that the RN1 was targeted more towards the begginer to intermediate level. That doesn't mean that it isn't capable of really great performance - it is. In fact quite a few of the entries at RoboGames were RN1 based, and did very well.
Second is the relative size. The AT01 is larger and heavier, which typically makes the home position setup and alignment more critical.
Third, the effective servo resolution is much greater for the AT01 compared to the RN1 which is only 1 count/degree. You would think that more resolution would make it easier to align, but it typically works the other way around. The legs for both robots are complex linkages involving 10 servos, all of which interact. With fewer possible settings it seems to be easier to setup the RN1 comparied to the AT01.
Beyond that, the process used by the AT01 users to setup the home position consistently isn't very well documented - at least not yet.
I also notice that there is very little support in the way of online and offline community.
It's a function of how long the robot has been in the market, and how many customers there are. The international RN1 online community is very large compared to any of the alternative kits at this point.
The AT01 has been very popular in Japan, and there's a strong user community here, but that doesn't help people outside of Japan much.
BTW, I am an RN owner.
It's a good choice, with lots of potential.
DirtyRoboto wrote:Do any of the Manoi owners here have other bipeds?
If so, then how does the Manoi compare?
A MANOI AT01, Kondo KHR-1 (upgraded to the RCB-3), and a couple others. I've posted extensively about the AT01, so it probably isn't useful to repeat all that here.
I am reading alot of comments about the overall balance of the robot and wonder how modding the bot will effect balance. I guess you would have to code new moves for every addition of weight!
It depends on how extensive the mods are. It's a combination of the weight and geometry. Adding more weight at the robots COG doesn't make as much difference as adding weight far from the COG.
For example, I've added weight (additional boards and accessories) to the AT01 body and didn't have to do more than just minor adjustments to the motions. But when I added grippers to the ends of each arm the necessary motion adjustments were fairly major.
The RN1 seems much less sensitive to inaccurate zeroing, does this mean it was designed towards a begginer to intermediate person.
There are several factors at work. You're correct in assuming that the RN1 was targeted more towards the begginer to intermediate level. That doesn't mean that it isn't capable of really great performance - it is. In fact quite a few of the entries at RoboGames were RN1 based, and did very well.
Second is the relative size. The AT01 is larger and heavier, which typically makes the home position setup and alignment more critical.
Third, the effective servo resolution is much greater for the AT01 compared to the RN1 which is only 1 count/degree. You would think that more resolution would make it easier to align, but it typically works the other way around. The legs for both robots are complex linkages involving 10 servos, all of which interact. With fewer possible settings it seems to be easier to setup the RN1 comparied to the AT01.
Beyond that, the process used by the AT01 users to setup the home position consistently isn't very well documented - at least not yet.
I also notice that there is very little support in the way of online and offline community.
It's a function of how long the robot has been in the market, and how many customers there are. The international RN1 online community is very large compared to any of the alternative kits at this point.
The AT01 has been very popular in Japan, and there's a strong user community here, but that doesn't help people outside of Japan much.
BTW, I am an RN owner.
It's a good choice, with lots of potential.