by beermat » Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:29 am
by beermat
Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:29 am
Interesting....interesting. I'm just a few weeks into this whole field, and only with a RN, so I'm not at the point where I can recognize what seem like nuances to me but really are vital improvements to the more experienced, plus I'm not necessarily gleaning all the appropriate facts, which is why I looked for others to comment.
Fully interrupt capable is definately a big plus. Whilst new to robotics, software is my life and I was quickly frustrated with the language for RN. No interrupts or multithreading capabilities, not even simple stuff like parameter passing to SUBs (unless I'm missing that?!), so that's a big plus. Strength is also important but as every action has an equal and opposite reaction, balance and posture are equally important, I would imagine? And, although I'm not a fan of the stock body casing, I forgot to mention that I do think it is a plus in the way it is designed to potentially integrate different body casings when Matt manufactures them
I fully agree with Hive - if we could get a 'walking' thread going and figure out how to work together on improving the stock one, that'd be awesome. It seems to be one of the weak areas in RNs motion repertoire, albiet the conservative gait means repeatable and stable with some room for a range of zero positions, which is probably and understandably more important to Hitec. But it's been almost a year since RN hit the shelves?!
And Capt - in this Internet world, you need to have a thick skin to take what people can throw at you on forums. I think you placed too much emphasis on saying the cardboard designs
prove your product works, and we jumped on it. Prototypes prove one thing definatively, and that is that the prototype is a prototype. Nothing more. They usually show the concept is good in principle, but do NOT prove the real thing works. How many designers and engineers have built scale prototypes out of easily worked materials and had them fail abysmally when scaled up, or attempted to be made out of the real material, or put under real life stresses, or all of the above. Theory and reality are sadly different. My professional career is about turning theoretical concepts into reality, and it just aint that easy. Tell me you at least understand the merits of this argument? Show me that your grippers can support the RN in a handstand without collapsing in on themselves, and I'll consider them. You cannot show me that using cardboard. And I'm not handing over cash to a stranger on the internet for nothing in return in the hope that enough other people do the same to generate enough funds to make it a zero-loss venture for you. You also have to see the rationale behind all this, right? Matt produced home made prototypes out of aluminum and demo'd them, too. That's a key difference.
But, one thing I do not want to do is appear to bully you or suppress your desire to advance this community. You've obviously put a lot of thought and effort into what you are doing and you do have a goal of making it easier for us to customize our 'bots, and I thank you for that, and you are definately down the path with the principles. I'm just a seein' is believin' guy with a dry/evil sense of humour and, well, you just gotta deal with that and blow our minds and produce a real product
Interesting....interesting. I'm just a few weeks into this whole field, and only with a RN, so I'm not at the point where I can recognize what seem like nuances to me but really are vital improvements to the more experienced, plus I'm not necessarily gleaning all the appropriate facts, which is why I looked for others to comment.
Fully interrupt capable is definately a big plus. Whilst new to robotics, software is my life and I was quickly frustrated with the language for RN. No interrupts or multithreading capabilities, not even simple stuff like parameter passing to SUBs (unless I'm missing that?!), so that's a big plus. Strength is also important but as every action has an equal and opposite reaction, balance and posture are equally important, I would imagine? And, although I'm not a fan of the stock body casing, I forgot to mention that I do think it is a plus in the way it is designed to potentially integrate different body casings when Matt manufactures them
I fully agree with Hive - if we could get a 'walking' thread going and figure out how to work together on improving the stock one, that'd be awesome. It seems to be one of the weak areas in RNs motion repertoire, albiet the conservative gait means repeatable and stable with some room for a range of zero positions, which is probably and understandably more important to Hitec. But it's been almost a year since RN hit the shelves?!
And Capt - in this Internet world, you need to have a thick skin to take what people can throw at you on forums. I think you placed too much emphasis on saying the cardboard designs
prove your product works, and we jumped on it. Prototypes prove one thing definatively, and that is that the prototype is a prototype. Nothing more. They usually show the concept is good in principle, but do NOT prove the real thing works. How many designers and engineers have built scale prototypes out of easily worked materials and had them fail abysmally when scaled up, or attempted to be made out of the real material, or put under real life stresses, or all of the above. Theory and reality are sadly different. My professional career is about turning theoretical concepts into reality, and it just aint that easy. Tell me you at least understand the merits of this argument? Show me that your grippers can support the RN in a handstand without collapsing in on themselves, and I'll consider them. You cannot show me that using cardboard. And I'm not handing over cash to a stranger on the internet for nothing in return in the hope that enough other people do the same to generate enough funds to make it a zero-loss venture for you. You also have to see the rationale behind all this, right? Matt produced home made prototypes out of aluminum and demo'd them, too. That's a key difference.
But, one thing I do not want to do is appear to bully you or suppress your desire to advance this community. You've obviously put a lot of thought and effort into what you are doing and you do have a goal of making it easier for us to customize our 'bots, and I thank you for that, and you are definately down the path with the principles. I'm just a seein' is believin' guy with a dry/evil sense of humour and, well, you just gotta deal with that and blow our minds and produce a real product