Legacy Forum: Preserving Nearly 20 Years of Community History - A Time Capsule of Discussions, Memories, and Shared Experiences.

KRS-784(blue) replaced with KRS-786(red)

KHR-1, KHR-2HV, KHR-3HV, ICS servos, RCB controllers and other Kondo products
5 postsPage 1 of 1
5 postsPage 1 of 1

KRS-784(blue) replaced with KRS-786(red)

Post by ryann2k1 » Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:29 am

Post by ryann2k1
Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:29 am

Hi all,
I am planning to change two servos(krs-784 blue version) in my robot'legs(KHR-1) with krs-786 red version. is it still possible for RCB-1 boards to control the blue and the red versions?
I am worried to ruin my RCB-1 boards.
Thank you.

Cheers,

ryann2k1
Hi all,
I am planning to change two servos(krs-784 blue version) in my robot'legs(KHR-1) with krs-786 red version. is it still possible for RCB-1 boards to control the blue and the red versions?
I am worried to ruin my RCB-1 boards.
Thank you.

Cheers,

ryann2k1
ryann2k1
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:00 am

Post by limor » Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:03 pm

Post by limor
Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:03 pm

Hi Ryan,

The RCB-1 will work with the 786 servo but you wont get much more than you already have.

If you want more power then there are some new high-voltage servos that are compatible in shape to the 784/786 but that would require replacing the RCB-1 with RCB-3

If you want more programming options, then just change the controler board.
Hi Ryan,

The RCB-1 will work with the 786 servo but you wont get much more than you already have.

If you want more power then there are some new high-voltage servos that are compatible in shape to the 784/786 but that would require replacing the RCB-1 with RCB-3

If you want more programming options, then just change the controler board.
limor
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:00 am
Location: London, UK

Post by ryann2k1 » Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:26 am

Post by ryann2k1
Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:26 am

Hi Limor,

Thank you for your info Limor.
Since I have broken 1 one of my servos, so I will use 786 red version as the fact, as what I could infer from what you said, RCB1 can handle 786 and 784 simultaneously.

What do you think this board?
http://www.ixs.co.jp/products/controlle ... ard-j.html

anyone has used this board?
Since it offers several features, this board could be a good option for developing programming capability, including sensors.

Cheers

ryann2k1
Hi Limor,

Thank you for your info Limor.
Since I have broken 1 one of my servos, so I will use 786 red version as the fact, as what I could infer from what you said, RCB1 can handle 786 and 784 simultaneously.

What do you think this board?
http://www.ixs.co.jp/products/controlle ... ard-j.html

anyone has used this board?
Since it offers several features, this board could be a good option for developing programming capability, including sensors.

Cheers

ryann2k1
ryann2k1
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:00 am

Post by tempusmaster » Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:25 am

Post by tempusmaster
Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:25 am

ryann2k1 wrote:What do you think this board?
http://www.ixs.co.jp/products/controlle ... ard-j.html

anyone has used this board?
Since it offers several features, this board could be a good option for developing programming capability, including sensors.

It has a lot of potential, but there aren't many users yet since it was just announced in Japan recently. It's version 0.9.

In terms of program development, expandability, and handling sensors, it has more potential than the RCB3 - assuming you are able to do your own development - and is more standardized and open than the Motion Processor. The downsides at this point appear to be the price ($$$), support outside of Japan and docs.
ryann2k1 wrote:What do you think this board?
http://www.ixs.co.jp/products/controlle ... ard-j.html

anyone has used this board?
Since it offers several features, this board could be a good option for developing programming capability, including sensors.

It has a lot of potential, but there aren't many users yet since it was just announced in Japan recently. It's version 0.9.

In terms of program development, expandability, and handling sensors, it has more potential than the RCB3 - assuming you are able to do your own development - and is more standardized and open than the Motion Processor. The downsides at this point appear to be the price ($$$), support outside of Japan and docs.
Latest robot news, information, reviews, hacks, photos, and videos - with special on-site coverage from Japan
http://www.robots-dreams.com
tempusmaster
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:00 am

Post by ryann2k1 » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:58 am

Post by ryann2k1
Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:58 am

Thanks for the info..
for a while we put aside our KHR-1..we just purchase a new bioloid..
but... we still keep trying to develop a board for our KHR-1.

cheers,

ryann2k1
Thanks for the info..
for a while we put aside our KHR-1..we just purchase a new bioloid..
but... we still keep trying to develop a board for our KHR-1.

cheers,

ryann2k1
ryann2k1
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:00 am


5 postsPage 1 of 1
5 postsPage 1 of 1