by tempusmaster » Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:28 pm
by tempusmaster
Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:28 pm
Robo1 wrote:I think for this bot the phrase "you get what you pay for". I say this after looking at the stats for the servo's there not that strong 6kg-cm2 for the best spec. ones. But I have to admit that it does have some nice features like rotating upper body. This could be like your thread tempusmaster about RN2, only if it ha better servos. As I think 10kg-cm2 is the minimum as my khr struggles as it is. I couldn't image having less powerful servos.
Bren
Agreed, though it might be okay.
It seems to be smaller and lighter than the KHR series, and torque is linear force applied at a radius. As the robot size shrinks, the torque required goes down, which is why the i-SOBOT works so well and is so cheap. It will be interesting to see once they release more information on it.
Robo1 wrote:I think for this bot the phrase "you get what you pay for". I say this after looking at the stats for the servo's there not that strong 6kg-cm2 for the best spec. ones. But I have to admit that it does have some nice features like rotating upper body. This could be like your thread tempusmaster about RN2, only if it ha better servos. As I think 10kg-cm2 is the minimum as my khr struggles as it is. I couldn't image having less powerful servos.
Bren
Agreed, though it might be okay.
It seems to be smaller and lighter than the KHR series, and torque is linear force applied at a radius. As the robot size shrinks, the torque required goes down, which is why the i-SOBOT works so well and is so cheap. It will be interesting to see once they release more information on it.