by PedroR » Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:28 pm
by PedroR
Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:28 pm
Hi mantrid
afaik the behaviour of the resin over time is currently the biggest "unkown" at the moment.
FFD machines (like the Replicator and similar) use standard, cheap, well known materials, including ABS and PLA.
There are new compounds being produced with PLA as it seems to work much better with FFD technology than ABS in terms of shrinkage and layer bonding (making strong parts).
Unlike what peolpe think, a part printed in a FFD machine in PLA is much stronger than its ABS counterpart. (this is matter for a separate thread which I hope I can post soon to clear this up).
Regarding the Form1 and all other UV based machines, they seem to be capable of impressive resolutions but no one yet knows in detail how each resin behaves (and how much it costs).
Different manufacturers seem to be using different combinatins or formulas.
When you inquire about a resin you can ask for the Materal Datashet and also for the MSD (Material Safety datasheet).
Here are a few things to look out for to compare materials:
From the Material datasheet (practical data, physical properties):
- Glass point
- Melting point
- Density (as it will affect how much each cubic centimeter costs to print).
- Resistance to UV
- Resistance to moist, water and/or rain
- Can the material be painted
From the MSD:
- Environmental precautions (ABS for examples can take 100-200 years to break down at a landfill)
- Potential health effects: eye contact, skin contact, ingestion, Inhalation (both uncured and cured).
- Flammability
Having said this, machines like the Form 1 have the great advantage of resolution over FFD machines.
FFD have other advantages such as the use of standard, fairly low cost materials (ABS, PLA) and possibility of tuning the printing speed vs resolution for fine printing or fast prototyping.
I'm sure there will be room for both technologies for some time to come and I don't even know if one will ever completely replace the other.
Regards
Pedro.
Hi mantrid
afaik the behaviour of the resin over time is currently the biggest "unkown" at the moment.
FFD machines (like the Replicator and similar) use standard, cheap, well known materials, including ABS and PLA.
There are new compounds being produced with PLA as it seems to work much better with FFD technology than ABS in terms of shrinkage and layer bonding (making strong parts).
Unlike what peolpe think, a part printed in a FFD machine in PLA is much stronger than its ABS counterpart. (this is matter for a separate thread which I hope I can post soon to clear this up).
Regarding the Form1 and all other UV based machines, they seem to be capable of impressive resolutions but no one yet knows in detail how each resin behaves (and how much it costs).
Different manufacturers seem to be using different combinatins or formulas.
When you inquire about a resin you can ask for the Materal Datashet and also for the MSD (Material Safety datasheet).
Here are a few things to look out for to compare materials:
From the Material datasheet (practical data, physical properties):
- Glass point
- Melting point
- Density (as it will affect how much each cubic centimeter costs to print).
- Resistance to UV
- Resistance to moist, water and/or rain
- Can the material be painted
From the MSD:
- Environmental precautions (ABS for examples can take 100-200 years to break down at a landfill)
- Potential health effects: eye contact, skin contact, ingestion, Inhalation (both uncured and cured).
- Flammability
Having said this, machines like the Form 1 have the great advantage of resolution over FFD machines.
FFD have other advantages such as the use of standard, fairly low cost materials (ABS, PLA) and possibility of tuning the printing speed vs resolution for fine printing or fast prototyping.
I'm sure there will be room for both technologies for some time to come and I don't even know if one will ever completely replace the other.
Regards
Pedro.