by i-Bot » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:30 pm
by i-Bot
Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:30 pm
As Upgrayd says the difference is minor. The overall joint layout is the same since it is only the axis which is important not the servo position.
If you conform to the general Darwin OP joint layout described here:
http://robosavvy.com/site/index.php?opt ... 1&Itemid=2
then changes to the software are parametric changes for the different dimensions and some setting of servo directions and zeros.
If you diverge from the Darwin-OP layout, then more work is required to modify the IK code.
The other thing is joint constraints, though that is more important form complex moves like getting up, rather than walking.
As Upgrayd says the difference is minor. The overall joint layout is the same since it is only the axis which is important not the servo position.
If you conform to the general Darwin OP joint layout described here:
http://robosavvy.com/site/index.php?opt ... 1&Itemid=2
then changes to the software are parametric changes for the different dimensions and some setting of servo directions and zeros.
If you diverge from the Darwin-OP layout, then more work is required to modify the IK code.
The other thing is joint constraints, though that is more important form complex moves like getting up, rather than walking.