limor wrote:Thank you for posting this.
How wide is the pulley? have you tested it in the robot ?
No problem!
It's .040 inch, about 1 mm wide. I have a turned adapter waiting to be finished on my lathe to cut the pulley groove, the Hitec hub is too thin to grasp in either my 3 jaw or 4 jaw chuck. Haven't tested it in the 'bot yet. My reason for wanting to use a pulley was to add a DOF without upsetting the geometry of the RN-1 too much, and have closer to 180 degree travel than with a pushrod with a thin profile.
That should work!
26.45 pounds, very similar to what I found. I was amazed to find that this kind of stuff is readily available.
Initially I thought of doing something similar to what you did.
...
But then I realized that this configuration may limit the possible resolution of the angles of rotation. If the wire is wound twice around the pulley (using something like a V profile pulley), then you can get a full 360 degrees of rotation resolution.
Yes, I've seen that done in old plotter - printers (multiple loops on the pulley). I have a hub from one right here. They just cut a flat bottom on the outer diameter, with two "rails" on the edges to keep the cable on it (no true "V"). If I remember right, they just used a spring to tension the cable, but then space wasn't an issue for them (and the load was very light compared to bots!).
I am only looking for 180, and to add loops will mean I need a thicker pulley - it's a slightly different application.
I prefer using plastic for the pulley for now and I'm not sure about using screws to hold the wire in place as these can break the plastic when the wire is under tension. So the the plan is to use some variant of a fisherman's knot to close the wire loop.
I like the closed loop idea to get around having to worry about the tension of terminating the cable with a screw. I would think you'd be fine with your approach - loop the wire through the pulley, knot it, slip it on your pulleys, tension it. You'd need just enough adjustment for the difference to slip the loop onto the pulley.
There should be enough friction in the contact areas with the pulley to prevent slippage I hope without the need for screws. I made a little tensioner that can be configured with a screw. the wire is looped twice around the pulley and then driven through a small tunnel through the pulley to the little tensioner. The tension applies a force on a little nut that is embedded in the plastic in addition to the threads of the screw.
In this plotter wheel, they just do hard right angles, it locks the cable down pretty well (entry point of cable from outside to inner area of the pulley).
See below, this is from a very old plotter. This was a driver wheel, attached directly to a stepper motor. You can see how they terminated the ends - they used two screws on top of the pulley (threaded holes, wire is tucked into one in the pic). This had multiple loops for travel on the plotter, but you can get 360 with one extra loop. Note the "groove" shape - just a flat channel.
I do have concern for this approach in our applications - I haven't done any "stress stretch" testing yet. I need to hang a weight of several lb / kg and see how it bounces, how much force will make the cable stretch. I hope it isn't too springy.... Next step for me would be a flat belt approach.
limor wrote:Thank you for posting this.
How wide is the pulley? have you tested it in the robot ?
No problem!
It's .040 inch, about 1 mm wide. I have a turned adapter waiting to be finished on my lathe to cut the pulley groove, the Hitec hub is too thin to grasp in either my 3 jaw or 4 jaw chuck. Haven't tested it in the 'bot yet. My reason for wanting to use a pulley was to add a DOF without upsetting the geometry of the RN-1 too much, and have closer to 180 degree travel than with a pushrod with a thin profile.
That should work!
26.45 pounds, very similar to what I found. I was amazed to find that this kind of stuff is readily available.
Initially I thought of doing something similar to what you did.
...
But then I realized that this configuration may limit the possible resolution of the angles of rotation. If the wire is wound twice around the pulley (using something like a V profile pulley), then you can get a full 360 degrees of rotation resolution.
Yes, I've seen that done in old plotter - printers (multiple loops on the pulley). I have a hub from one right here. They just cut a flat bottom on the outer diameter, with two "rails" on the edges to keep the cable on it (no true "V"). If I remember right, they just used a spring to tension the cable, but then space wasn't an issue for them (and the load was very light compared to bots!).
I am only looking for 180, and to add loops will mean I need a thicker pulley - it's a slightly different application.
I prefer using plastic for the pulley for now and I'm not sure about using screws to hold the wire in place as these can break the plastic when the wire is under tension. So the the plan is to use some variant of a fisherman's knot to close the wire loop.
I like the closed loop idea to get around having to worry about the tension of terminating the cable with a screw. I would think you'd be fine with your approach - loop the wire through the pulley, knot it, slip it on your pulleys, tension it. You'd need just enough adjustment for the difference to slip the loop onto the pulley.
There should be enough friction in the contact areas with the pulley to prevent slippage I hope without the need for screws. I made a little tensioner that can be configured with a screw. the wire is looped twice around the pulley and then driven through a small tunnel through the pulley to the little tensioner. The tension applies a force on a little nut that is embedded in the plastic in addition to the threads of the screw.
In this plotter wheel, they just do hard right angles, it locks the cable down pretty well (entry point of cable from outside to inner area of the pulley).
See below, this is from a very old plotter. This was a driver wheel, attached directly to a stepper motor. You can see how they terminated the ends - they used two screws on top of the pulley (threaded holes, wire is tucked into one in the pic). This had multiple loops for travel on the plotter, but you can get 360 with one extra loop. Note the "groove" shape - just a flat channel.
I do have concern for this approach in our applications - I haven't done any "stress stretch" testing yet. I need to hang a weight of several lb / kg and see how it bounces, how much force will make the cable stretch. I hope it isn't too springy.... Next step for me would be a flat belt approach.