by i-Bot » Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:38 am
by i-Bot
Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:38 am
I can only comment for the RoboNova.
The RoboNova is very specific about the Gyros that are supported: the PG-03 and the KRG-1.
The way the Gryo is used is different from in a helicopter. In the helicopter the gyro sits between the receiver and the servo. It takes the position pulse from the receiver and outputs a modified servo pulse based on the input pulse and the gyro output. In the RoboNova the controller outputs a fixed length pulse and then receives back a modified pulse which represents the gyro output. This pulse is measured to give a value, which is then used to modify the servo position, using the direction and the sensitivity. To achieve this it makes use of a known relationship between the input and output pulse for both types of supported Gyro. This relationship changes fo different gyros, and while not important for helicopters, would prevent other gyros working with th RoboNova, unless they had the exact same relationship of input to output.
You may be lucky, but I think I recall the Futaba did not work from other posts.
Given how the Gyro is used in the RoboNova, I doubt if a better quality Gyro is justified. I think the way forward is with a proper IMU.
I can only comment for the RoboNova.
The RoboNova is very specific about the Gyros that are supported: the PG-03 and the KRG-1.
The way the Gryo is used is different from in a helicopter. In the helicopter the gyro sits between the receiver and the servo. It takes the position pulse from the receiver and outputs a modified servo pulse based on the input pulse and the gyro output. In the RoboNova the controller outputs a fixed length pulse and then receives back a modified pulse which represents the gyro output. This pulse is measured to give a value, which is then used to modify the servo position, using the direction and the sensitivity. To achieve this it makes use of a known relationship between the input and output pulse for both types of supported Gyro. This relationship changes fo different gyros, and while not important for helicopters, would prevent other gyros working with th RoboNova, unless they had the exact same relationship of input to output.
You may be lucky, but I think I recall the Futaba did not work from other posts.
Given how the Gyro is used in the RoboNova, I doubt if a better quality Gyro is justified. I think the way forward is with a proper IMU.