Legacy Forum: Preserving Nearly 20 Years of Community History - A Time Capsule of Discussions, Memories, and Shared Experiences.

Wifi for ROBONOVA

Hitec robotics including ROBONOVA humanoid, HSR-8498HB servos, MR C-3024 Controllers and RoboBasic
4 postsPage 1 of 1
4 postsPage 1 of 1

Wifi for ROBONOVA

Post by Chrisbie » Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:59 pm

Post by Chrisbie
Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:59 pm

HI, I have decided to post this separately. I have a SANDISK SDIO card WIFI, will it be possible to connect it to the ROBONOVA the same as the bluettoth? Or are there other WIFI card possible to connect to ROBONOVA. Thanks....

http://www.davespda.com/reviews/other/sdsdiowifi.htm
HI, I have decided to post this separately. I have a SANDISK SDIO card WIFI, will it be possible to connect it to the ROBONOVA the same as the bluettoth? Or are there other WIFI card possible to connect to ROBONOVA. Thanks....

http://www.davespda.com/reviews/other/sdsdiowifi.htm
Chrisbie
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 1:00 am

Post by subpilot » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:26 pm

Post by subpilot
Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:26 pm

That would be quite a feat to pull off. The card uses an SPI interface which has 2 data lines, a clock and a chip select. In order to talk to it you would have to bit-bang the I/O lines using RoboBasic. I don't know the specific timing requirements for that board but meeting them using RB would probably be nearly, if not totally, impossible. Along with that you would need to emulate the network interface driver.
Now if you could run C on the RN controller it would be a different story as there is tons of info on doing it using the ARM processors.
Here's a module from Lantronixs that would be much easier to deal with. http://store.wibots.com/wp.html
That would be quite a feat to pull off. The card uses an SPI interface which has 2 data lines, a clock and a chip select. In order to talk to it you would have to bit-bang the I/O lines using RoboBasic. I don't know the specific timing requirements for that board but meeting them using RB would probably be nearly, if not totally, impossible. Along with that you would need to emulate the network interface driver.
Now if you could run C on the RN controller it would be a different story as there is tons of info on doing it using the ARM processors.
Here's a module from Lantronixs that would be much easier to deal with. http://store.wibots.com/wp.html
subpilot
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Lake Arrowhead, Ca,USA

Post by Gil » Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:37 am

Post by Gil
Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:37 am

I'm more concearned about battery usage. Wifi kills my laptop battery in no time so a RN1 battery will last... 10 minutes?
I'm more concearned about battery usage. Wifi kills my laptop battery in no time so a RN1 battery will last... 10 minutes?
Gil
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:00 am

Post by subpilot » Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:34 am

Post by subpilot
Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:34 am

The Wiport draws 460mA peak at 3.3V which is about 1/4 the power a stock RN normally uses while standing around. I suspect other Wifi boards would be similar. That's fairly significant compared to Bluetooth but does support much higher data rates so may be worth it if you have a high bandwidth requirement like video etc.
The RN is underpowered with the NiMH batt and you need to upgrade the power supply to make add-ons like Wifi viable. I like Matt's idea of putting the batteries on the bottom of the feet. Allmost everything you do makes the COG move upward and makes the robot more unstable than it already is. Falling over is a definite negative especially if you are showing off the robot and stability seems like a priority to me.
The Wiport draws 460mA peak at 3.3V which is about 1/4 the power a stock RN normally uses while standing around. I suspect other Wifi boards would be similar. That's fairly significant compared to Bluetooth but does support much higher data rates so may be worth it if you have a high bandwidth requirement like video etc.
The RN is underpowered with the NiMH batt and you need to upgrade the power supply to make add-ons like Wifi viable. I like Matt's idea of putting the batteries on the bottom of the feet. Allmost everything you do makes the COG move upward and makes the robot more unstable than it already is. Falling over is a definite negative especially if you are showing off the robot and stability seems like a priority to me.
subpilot
Savvy Roboteer
Savvy Roboteer
User avatar
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Lake Arrowhead, Ca,USA


4 postsPage 1 of 1
4 postsPage 1 of 1