by bauermech » Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:31 pm
by bauermech
Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:31 pm
why do you bother having all the holes inserted arund the servo horn hole-instead of just four-?
Well, thats probably where the 'I have too much time on my hands' thing comes into play.
No really, I was concerned about an arm being ripped off during ROBO-ONE. Same holds true with the leg rotation brackets. If the horns were aluminum it'd be another story.
From what I see in your picture it also seems that we have reversed the brackets from my deisgn (my triangular U-bracket contains the four screw holes you inserted into the stock U-bracket)-but thats just an observation.
Yup, you're right. The 'ol flip-a-roo
have you found any significance to pushing the servo down to one side (in your new bracket). Because I have mine centered and it works really well. Just curious how your experience has been Matt.
Hmmmm. I should really take some pics to help explain this... I'll get some around after I get done putting Pawn back together. I'll do my best now though...
I moved them off-center to: #1 keep 'em aligned, #2 when in their 'home position' there is an ample amount of surface area on both the modified servo casing and bracket to help support the rest of the arm. However, when they turn, they (the horns and shafts) are on their own to support the weight of the arm (not that there's a lot).
I doubt there is a significant difference in overall functionality between the two.
The second generation of Rook's Pawn consumed all 24 servo ports with the rotating arms in place. It's functionality was nice, but made him a little extra top-heavy for me. I ended up scrapping the arm rotation in the end (at least for now). The leg servos really dig the extra support, so it's staying like it is.... like I said, i'll get some pics around.
Nice hands Tempusmaster! Some one needs to make some shooting Gundam rocket fists
why do you bother having all the holes inserted arund the servo horn hole-instead of just four-?
Well, thats probably where the 'I have too much time on my hands' thing comes into play.
No really, I was concerned about an arm being ripped off during ROBO-ONE. Same holds true with the leg rotation brackets. If the horns were aluminum it'd be another story.
From what I see in your picture it also seems that we have reversed the brackets from my deisgn (my triangular U-bracket contains the four screw holes you inserted into the stock U-bracket)-but thats just an observation.
Yup, you're right. The 'ol flip-a-roo
have you found any significance to pushing the servo down to one side (in your new bracket). Because I have mine centered and it works really well. Just curious how your experience has been Matt.
Hmmmm. I should really take some pics to help explain this... I'll get some around after I get done putting Pawn back together. I'll do my best now though...
I moved them off-center to: #1 keep 'em aligned, #2 when in their 'home position' there is an ample amount of surface area on both the modified servo casing and bracket to help support the rest of the arm. However, when they turn, they (the horns and shafts) are on their own to support the weight of the arm (not that there's a lot).
I doubt there is a significant difference in overall functionality between the two.
The second generation of Rook's Pawn consumed all 24 servo ports with the rotating arms in place. It's functionality was nice, but made him a little extra top-heavy for me. I ended up scrapping the arm rotation in the end (at least for now). The leg servos really dig the extra support, so it's staying like it is.... like I said, i'll get some pics around.
Nice hands Tempusmaster! Some one needs to make some shooting Gundam rocket fists