by beermat » Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:00 pm
by beermat
Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:00 pm
Instead of losing 9 buttons, why not have one button put you into a sub that then reads the remote for the number of loops you wish to execute and then puts you back into the main loop? That way, you'd only lose one button.
Instead of losing 9 buttons, why not have one button put you into a sub that then reads the remote for the number of loops you wish to execute and then puts you back into the main loop? That way, you'd only lose one button.