by Zypkin » Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:09 am
by Zypkin
Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:09 am
Biodog wrote:That's funny, you're realizing what robotics reseachers are on since a few years, and I'm not sure they have your results
What if I am one of those researchers?
...LOL...
...I didnt start yesterday to make robots, so I guess I know pretty much what I'm talking about
I didnt write it is an easy thing to do... I'm just working on it... and so far I've done good, meaning that the thing is moving, strafing and rolling. I am kind of excited for the results... and that's one of the reasons for which I'm here sharing with you.
Anyway... if U run a search on Google or Youtube you will find several examples of the very same thing I'm working on. Sure, there is much less than on any other kind of robot... just because driving an hyper redundant multilink robot is much more complex than driving 2 wheels and the hardware is much more expensive
Progression using sine functions on snake-like robots is something known since looooong time ago, I didnt invent anything.
Just have a look at this:
http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/projects/ ... gaits.html
If you go on Citeseer (Robotics search engine for so called researchers) you can easily find papers like this one:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/paper ... 97path.pdf
...which is quite complicated but tells you a lot on how far you can go with planning the motion of your robot
Finally... for all the non believers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdoPXVQbidw
This is actually the only video I have and it shows the very first successful sequence of movement... therefore it's quite creepy
Enjoy,
Zyp
Biodog wrote:That's funny, you're realizing what robotics reseachers are on since a few years, and I'm not sure they have your results
What if I am one of those researchers?
...LOL...
...I didnt start yesterday to make robots, so I guess I know pretty much what I'm talking about
I didnt write it is an easy thing to do... I'm just working on it... and so far I've done good, meaning that the thing is moving, strafing and rolling. I am kind of excited for the results... and that's one of the reasons for which I'm here sharing with you.
Anyway... if U run a search on Google or Youtube you will find several examples of the very same thing I'm working on. Sure, there is much less than on any other kind of robot... just because driving an hyper redundant multilink robot is much more complex than driving 2 wheels and the hardware is much more expensive
Progression using sine functions on snake-like robots is something known since looooong time ago, I didnt invent anything.
Just have a look at this:
http://voronoi.sbp.ri.cmu.edu/projects/ ... gaits.html
If you go on Citeseer (Robotics search engine for so called researchers) you can easily find papers like this one:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/paper ... 97path.pdf
...which is quite complicated but tells you a lot on how far you can go with planning the motion of your robot
Finally... for all the non believers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdoPXVQbidw
This is actually the only video I have and it shows the very first successful sequence of movement... therefore it's quite creepy
Enjoy,
Zyp