by StuartL » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:41 pm
by StuartL
Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:41 pm
In which case it's PS1/PS2 controllers only for now. If, for any reason, we find this inappropriate we will probably investigate alternative controllers.
There were four reasons we targeted PS1/2 controllers:
1) They're cheaply available in most countries.
2) The interface is not 'complicated' like a USB HID interface.
3) They're available with a variety of digital and analogue control configurations and layouts to suit the user.
4) The wireless controllers are specifically intended to be used in groups so have inherent anti-interference characteristics.
Point '4' is a big issue for us. The Zigbee units do see to work wonderfully when they're the only 2.4GHz unit around but as soon as you have other kit using the same channels the antenna/amplifier combination just doesn't seem to be reliable and you lose a lot of packets. The data rates are an issue for many-channel-control too.
In which case it's PS1/PS2 controllers only for now. If, for any reason, we find this inappropriate we will probably investigate alternative controllers.
There were four reasons we targeted PS1/2 controllers:
1) They're cheaply available in most countries.
2) The interface is not 'complicated' like a USB HID interface.
3) They're available with a variety of digital and analogue control configurations and layouts to suit the user.
4) The wireless controllers are specifically intended to be used in groups so have inherent anti-interference characteristics.
Point '4' is a big issue for us. The Zigbee units do see to work wonderfully when they're the only 2.4GHz unit around but as soon as you have other kit using the same channels the antenna/amplifier combination just doesn't seem to be reliable and you lose a lot of packets. The data rates are an issue for many-channel-control too.