by clusher » Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:51 pm
by clusher
Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:51 pm
Just noticed i forgot to thank you for the answer. You were right, of course.
Now a radical different question. I'm trying to copy cat a small experience I saw on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpFGROm-LQM
I've decided to use a position control based on the torque applied on the ankles. As the slope increases, so does the torque and I try to adjust the legs the way the video shows.
The first thing is the torque is really noisy. Just by being on a standup position I get torques of 0-120 on either direction, while I expected to see a zero torque. The second is that as I increase the slope the torque doesnt change until it is too late (robot falling over or sliding...)
I started out by making a velocity control loop, but the problems with the servos were the same...
Any ideas how to improve the feedback? I tried lowering the center of mass (bending the knees), but didn't too much...
Just noticed i forgot to thank you for the answer. You were right, of course.
Now a radical different question. I'm trying to copy cat a small experience I saw on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpFGROm-LQM
I've decided to use a position control based on the torque applied on the ankles. As the slope increases, so does the torque and I try to adjust the legs the way the video shows.
The first thing is the torque is really noisy. Just by being on a standup position I get torques of 0-120 on either direction, while I expected to see a zero torque. The second is that as I increase the slope the torque doesnt change until it is too late (robot falling over or sliding...)
I started out by making a velocity control loop, but the problems with the servos were the same...
Any ideas how to improve the feedback? I tried lowering the center of mass (bending the knees), but didn't too much...